14 ms·
How is it in terms of usability? I read there was support, tried a rockchip sbc and found support lacking. Judging from the functionality of various pine produc
by graphe 3y ago
How is it in terms of usability? I read there was support, tried a rockchip sbc and found support lacking. Judging from the functionality of various pine products and support, is this any different?
- CuriousCosmic 3y agothe pine product that shares this SoC (QuartzPro64) has to my knowledge not actually been released officially yet. The closest would probably be the Quartz64 which uses the RK3566. The RK3566 is pretty well supported but it has some quirks since most products just use its big brother the RK3568 instead so most of the dev efforts come from that model instead. The RK3588 is already used in a handful of pretty popular SBCs (such as the OrangePi5) so despite being newer and potentially having a bit less mature drivers in some areas, it is almost certainly getting way more development attention.
- zokier 3y agohttps://gitlab.collabora.com/hardware-enablement/rockchip-3588/notes-for-rockchip-3588/-/blob/main/mainline-status.md https://gitlab.collabora.com/hardware-enablement/rockchip-35... has some docs Really it boils down to specific SoC and even specific device; it is futile to try to generalize too much. But Rockchip has seen steady progress in this front, and I'd assume older devices like rk3399 based ones especially would have pretty solid support.
- rcarmo 3y agoDon't know about this specific piece of code yet, but I have had good results with one board (https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2024/01/20/1800 https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2024/01/20/1800) and mixed results with another (https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2024/02/10/2000 https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2024/02/10/2000). I have another couple RK3588 and RK3588S boards that I just got and that look promising, but I haven't done all my tests yet.