> I didn't say they did. You sure as hell heavily implied it then: >> so Red Hat refused to bundle it or support it, and wrote its own environment instead. U

> I didn't say they did. You sure as hell heavily implied it then: >> so Red Hat refused to bundle it or support it, and wrote its own environment instead. Unless by "wrote its own environment" you mean "packaged GNOME instead of KDE". > (And it was SuSE, now just SUSE. When attempting to rebut, attention to detail is paramount.) Got me. Except I'm not the "journalist". > How long do you think this stuff takes? Considering development on it didn't begin until late 2008, about two years after the supposed "drastic need to shift"? 2.5-3yrs, give or take. > Well that failed then, didn't it? And so did the Zune. Yet it was still designed as an iPod-killer. > [[Citation needed]] You're making the claims in your half-researched/personally-biased article. You cite them, ideally in the "article" itself.