3 ms·
I'm mostly ok with the idea that the text-to-image models do this. What blows me away is that the autoregressive model does it too. We're not even asking it to
by viraptor 3y ago
I'm mostly ok with the idea that the text-to-image models do this. What blows me away is that the autoregressive model does it too. We're not even asking it to produce a specific object which has a meaning or context assigned. The network learned to produce those representations as just "this is a useful decomposition if I want to recreate the same thing again". The jump from image compression to figuring out how to represent objects in space is insane. And makes me want to feed some optical illusions through that network - what's the depth map of the infinite staircase?