4 ms·
Interestingly, both terms return almost the same results. It seems even with the advent of AI/GPT, Google search still doesn't have even a basic understanding o
by csomar 3y ago
Interestingly, both terms return almost the same results. It seems even with the advent of AI/GPT, Google search still doesn't have even a basic understanding of the sentence typed. That being said, I haven't used Google search in years. It has stopped being useful a long time ago and it's way worse than the regular search.
- 2-718-281-828 3y agoin the case of intraracial photos it seems (statistically reasoning) that google has some understanding of the search and it is intentionally ignoring the search terms in favor of something "better".
- dash2 3y agoThere is actually a possible innocent explanation of this. * Google image search mostly looks at image captions. * Relatively few people caption their pictures "Me and Jane, a proud white woman and white man". Like, only white supremacists. * Relatively many people caption their pictures, "me and John, a white woman with a black husband". Like, interracial couples. * "white woman" becomes associated with interracial couples. * So does "white man". I don't know if this is the true story, but it would be funny if so.
- 2-718-281-828 3y agothat would certainly be a possible explanation
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]