4 ms·
... videos, not inline examples?
by klyrs 3y ago
... videos, not inline examples?
- happytoexplain 3y agoI'm not sure it's worth caring about. Either way seems to communicate the problem perfectly. They provide a playground with code.
- klyrs 3y agoBut my Canadian data rate...
- ivanjermakov 3y agoPerhaps because 4% of user agents don't support it.
- wenc 3y agoCSS sticky headings (the solution) won't work on the user agents that don't support it anyway, so they wouldn't be missing out. :)
- bruce511 3y agoThats not really an issue in this case. The only browsers not supporting it are ie11 and opera mini. (And a thing called QQbrowser which I confess I've never heard of.) I'm guess the 4% of traffic is largely ie11. If you are browsing the Web today with ie11 then there's a lot of css that isn't going to work right. And the impact of not supporting sticky is invisible - the table just works as it does now. So there's no -techical- reason not to use it. At this point it's either a cosmetic choice (mostly for overflow reasons) or unawareness of its existence.
- nox101 3y agoBecause the videos show the issue with out requiring instructions to the user on how to repo the issue being addressed. I've done this myself (usually with a gif though) because if I leave it as a exercise for the user to fiddle with 15% of them won't understand it.