3 ms·
The article and the linked NIST page were not specific about the BIOS flaw, but based on Google searches for "bios security flaw," it seems that even the worst
by gpcz 14y ago
The article and the linked NIST page were not specific about the BIOS flaw, but based on Google searches for "bios security flaw," it seems that even the worst ones (the CompuTrace Lojack flaw and Johanna Rutkowska's Intel flaw) require the attacker to have already compromised the operating system. If an attacker can compromise your computers' OSes, then disabling the hardware is probably the least of your worries.
By default, the major PC operating systems follow Ideas 1-3 of the "Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security" ( http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/dumb/ http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/d... ) in terms of executables. While you can reconfigure most common OSes not to follow these ideas, most home and business computers will follow the default configuration out of convenience.
- pgeorgi 14y agoDisabling the hardware is probably the least of your worries (depends on the job the hardware performs). Installing a permanent backdoor (that you only get rid of with external flashing hardware - OS reinstall won't help, new disks won't help, reflashing firmware won't help) is not.