3 ms·
I think it's because the engines are really heavy, so the centre of gravity is very low, despite their height. It's deceptive!
by doctor_eval 3y ago
I think it's because the engines are really heavy, so the centre of gravity is very low, despite their height. It's deceptive!
- narag 3y agoStill, the japanese mission had that problem. If the surface is guaranteed to be flat, low centre of gravity could be enough, but knowing there could be rocks or other kind of irregularities, I'd consider a fail safe shape.
- doctor_eval 3y agoI think the Japanese mission was much more complicated than that. It was supposed to fall on its side; but as I understand it, it fell on the wrong side. Whatever they build also has to fit in the launch cowling. Surveyor was tiny.
- narag 3y agoIt was supposed to fall on its side; but as I understand it, it fell on the wrong side. My point stands (unlike the probe, heh). If it call roll, a different shape could have helped. Whatever they build also has to fit in the launch cowling. Folding telescopic arms? I understand that this stuff is expensive and weight is limited, but the worst result is a failed landing.