These are good points, but we can't ignore that this technology is valuable for non-diabetics. We also know that "preventing" technology from being used is a lo

These are good points, but we can't ignore that this technology is valuable for non-diabetics. We also know that "preventing" technology from being used is a losing battle - though I'd be happy to hear of examples contrary to this. If a diabetic is going to attempt to use the device as a diagnostic, but they are aware that it is not fit for that purpose, that is their own choice. Like injecting insulin by "feel". Perhaps a better approach would be that insulin be delivered in collaboration with a certified device. That would close the loop on the amount of insulin being injected. I'm no expert on diabetes though, so i don't know the actual implications of that.