3 ms·
Aside: The account I’m responding to has been shadow banned since 2017. Now while I appreciate this post gave me a chance to talk about a very nerdy—and IMO in
by runarberg 3y ago
Aside:
The account I’m responding to has been shadow banned since 2017. Now while I appreciate this post gave me a chance to talk about a very nerdy—and IMO interesting—subject of the UN Trusteeship Counsel, and UN policy of decolonization in general, I’m curious why my parent’s post was vouched for. It hardly seems of any better quality than any of the other posts which were flagged.
- tguvot 3y agoProbably because it's of better quality
- runarberg 3y agoPerhaps. The other root posts under this submission are indeed of very bad quality, worthy of the flag even. I’m only a bit puzzled why this was worthy of a vouch. It is not as bad as the others, but it is still ultimately flamebate-y comment about geopolitics with little substance. The only thing nice I can say about it is that it hints (by accident) at an interesting aspect of the United Nations, which we can talk about.
- tguvot 3y agoeverything in the eyes of the beholder. maybe many people think that there is a lot of substance in those few words