3 ms·
I mean if you're not willing to sue somebody then they're always the judge/jury/executioner. It's a bit akin to all those people who complain it's impossible t
by lesuorac 3y ago
I mean if you're not willing to sue somebody then they're always the judge/jury/executioner.
It's a bit akin to all those people who complain it's impossible to know why Google closed your account despite evidence [1] to the contrary.
[1]: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-google-bothered-to-ap_b_213176 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-google-bothered-to-ap_b_2...
- theturtletalks 3y agoYou do realize most of these payment processors or even financial institutions have arbitration clauses right? And as a business, they have the legal right to refuse for any reason not disability related. Hell, they could deny a disabled person a loan based on the unlikelihood they would pay it back and then hide behind KYC/AML laws. Oh we're not denying you based on disability, it's just some flags have popped up in our system and we can't tell you why. Google doesn't have KYC/AML laws to hide behind. The funniest part is that HSBC already revealed to criminal organizations on how to evade KYC/AML tripwires. When you outlaw freedom, only the outlaws have freedom.