What in the article do you consider slander? Everything appears to be well-sourced and factual. If Avast has been selling re-identifiable data, that's a big de

What in the article do you consider slander? Everything appears to be well-sourced and factual. If Avast has been selling re-identifiable data, that's a big deal and everyone should know. I've long appreciated Ars journalism for its thoroughness and -- more importantly -- improvement when called out.