3 ms·
This is the tip of the iceberg of the massive increase in the Trudeau government's spending, and without oversight. There was a 2-person company that was found
by loceng 3y ago
This is the tip of the iceberg of the massive increase in the Trudeau government's spending, and without oversight.
There was a 2-person company that was found to have been paid $20 million of that $60 million and did no work.
NOTE: the $60 million price tag is only an ESTIMATE as the accounting was so poorly done, the person put in charge to investigate couldn't actually determine how much was spent due to how badly records were kept; which should be default assumed as purposefully done to hide money trails.
This Trudeau government has also refused to share with Canadians where exactly the additional $600 million went, which state-funded media companies receive the funds and how much each - on top of the $1.4 billion that CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Company) Received last year - up $200 million from the standard $1.2 billion, for the next 3 years.
- lm411 3y ago"It's a chalet! It's not a cottage." These guys are so dirty. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTwHLN-clXQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTwHLN-clXQ
- akudha 3y agoTrudeau government has also refused to share with Canadians where exactly the additional $600 How does this happen in a democracy? They say “nah, not gonna tell you” and everyone accepts it? No way to force them to disclose?
- loceng 3y agoThe Trudeau-Liberals forms a coalition with the NDP which gave them a defacto majority government + Liberals claim something like Canadians knowing what media-propagandists received how much state-funding media would be a security threat or something like that, so using a certain clause in bad faith to hide who's being rewarded for toeing their line.
- LudwigNagasena 3y agoBecause people keep voting for them.
- supsep2 3y ago[dead]
- loceng 3y agoAnd isn't it interesting how you're parroting the $2.2 billion amount, which was simply an estimate or guess (or propaganda) of how much that could balloon to; unless you have an updated source that's not speculation from 2018? And how much of the responsibility should IBM hold for this failure? Also, I wonder, do you know who in the government actually executed on the policy - even if it a bill was passed by the Conservatives? Was it unelected and unionized government workers who are tasked with it, and was it them who are more responsible or the politicians more responsible? Do you know where I can find that breakdown or are arguments going to stay fairly shallow rather than going deep to investigate where responsibility actually lies, rather than you seeming to try whataboutism that simply reinforces the "lesser of two evils" dichotomy that we've been forced to vote for.
- k12sosse 3y agoWhat I do know is my friends and their parents have had a living nightmare because it it.
- supsep2 3y agoI am not “parroting” anything and stop making this a left vs right debate. It should be everyone vs mega rich and mega powerful. The estimations are on the conservative end too, a google search will show that its damage is more. Our government sucks and has sucked for a long time.
- loceng 3y agoYou are in fact the one who made it left vs. right debate, I was referencing specifically the Trudeau government - not any political party, in part because the Liberals and NDP parties are not what they were more than 8 years ago. I was simply mentioning who was responsible for implementing and oversight of ArriveCan. And no, it should be the corrupt vs. everyone. Being rich-successful doesn't equate to causing harm to society nor being a bad actor, of course the bad actors will use that #EatTheRich propaganda to rile up an ideological mob to further divide and conquer and misdirect the mob at everyone wealthy-successful rather than being nuanced and precise in their targeting.