4 ms·
"But opponents say it blatantly violates the First Amendment and that it should left to parents, not the government, to monitor children’s social media use." [
by dudul 3y ago
"But opponents say it blatantly violates the First Amendment and that it should left to parents, not the government, to monitor children’s social media use."
[...]Democratic state Sen. Jason Pizzo sarcastically said lawmakers have other options if they want to parent other people’s children.
“Let’s have a bill that encourages engaging with your children, cooking dinner, sitting at a table together, making eye contact, calling grandma to see if she’s OK once in a while.” he said."
Wouldn't you apply this stupid argument to gambling, drinking alcohol, watching adult content, etc?