3 ms·
That seems unlikely. The original code base was fairly small and very much reads like one person was responsible for writing it. Also, the more people who know
by TheBlight 3y ago
That seems unlikely. The original code base was fairly small and very much reads like one person was responsible for writing it. Also, the more people who know a secret the less likely it is to be kept.
- chrsw 3y agoThis is true, but having multiple people involved makes it every difficult to pinpoint one true source. Plus, when I say multiple people I mean 2-3 or 3-4. Not like a big operation. And if these small number are so paranoid about privacy and identity that they invented Bitcoin, I would expect them to be able to keep a secret. I just find it hard to believe there isn't a single soul walking on this planet right now that has any idea who Satoshi Nakamoto is/was.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- elwell 3y agoSatoshi seems to have delved in the dark art technique of print output debugging: https://github.com/Maguines/Bitcoin-v0.1/blob/2c7a4c9bbb793c5029fc9363d504944b62f1ec4d/bitcoin0.1/src/db.cpp#L452-L456 https://github.com/Maguines/Bitcoin-v0.1/blob/2c7a4c9bbb793c...
- coffeebeqn 3y agoAlright put me on the suspect list