Reading the initial story, knowing that Saar was going to lose 100k, it seemed like this was a win for both sides, for 100k Saar could now show his ability to r

Reading the initial story, knowing that Saar was going to lose 100k, it seemed like this was a win for both sides, for 100k Saar could now show his ability to reasonably change opinion in the face of evidence, say that he had effectively funded a correct analysis of covid's source. & all while advertising Rootclaim as guiding this truth-seeking exercise with him playing devil's advocate Then the conclusion outlines the desperation after losing the debate, & all dignity is lost