3 ms·

I generally agree and understand. The reasoning is fine. But comments like this make me somewhere between sad and contemptuous towards the field. This neutral e

by wruza 3y ago

I generally agree and understand. The reasoning is fine. But comments like this make me somewhere between sad and contemptuous towards the field. This neutral explanation supports the baseline that no professional can vocalize anywhere and retain their face. I'm talking youtube focus & arrows issues here, not rocket science. Container alignment issues [1], scrolling issues [2], cosmic levels of bloat [$subj], you name it. Absolutely trivial things you can't screw up if you're at all hireable. It's not "unoptimized", it's distilled personal/group incompetence of those who ought to be the best. That I cannot respect. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yabDCV4ccQs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yabDCV4ccQs -- scroll to comments and/or switch between default/theater mode if not immediately obvious [2] half of the internet, especially ux blogs

npteljes 3y ago
Yeah, it's not my favorite experience either, and I found it really hard to be indifferent, especially in my earlier years. The goal is almost never a perfect product. And it's also a result of many people's involvement, who often have different values than I do, or what I expect of them.