3 ms·
Schools trying to prevent their students from using AI are fighting a rear-guard action. The detection tools will never be reliable, and the conflict between at
by tkgally 3y ago
Schools trying to prevent their students from using AI are fighting a rear-guard action. The detection tools will never be reliable, and the conflict between attempts to ban AI use in educational settings and the widespread use of AI in the real world will become increasingly apparent.
Just yesterday, Google added AI features to my Workspace account. Now, when I open a Google Doc, a handy menu appears offering to change the tone of the text, lengthen or shorten it, convert it to bullet points, or follow my custom prompt. When I’ve asked it to correct text that contains grammatical and spelling errors, it cleans up the mistakes while making only minor changes to the wording. It will also write a new text from scratch—no need to cut and paste from Gemini or ChatGPT.
It won’t be easy, but educators will just have to figure out new methods of teaching and evaluation that assume that students have powerful AI tools available at all times.
- whynotmaybe 3y agoYou just reminded me of my cobol exams in the 90s. We had to write (with our hands) the program on paper during a 3 hour exam where we couldn't leave the room and teacher checked them all manually. I guess this guy had been a cobol teacher for so long that his brain was part human, part compiler. He was wise enough to know that a few missing ; or . weren't a big deal and that the core logic was the most important stuff. And during our exercises session before the exam, any editor outside of the dos edit was prohibited. No wonder I always have a feeling of cheating whenever copilot finishes half of my code.