>It makes no sense to not let the site online in an archived form, for the posterity So do you believe this is an action taken out of spite, or that there may

>It makes no sense to not let the site online in an archived form, for the posterity So do you believe this is an action taken out of spite, or that there may be circumstances that a bunch of hackers aren't taking into account? I'm genuinely curious, because I don't believe it's spite, but can't think of the reason. Outside of some long-tail potential liability for which the value of maintaining the site doesn't overcome.