10 ms·
This is so quick! The demo being publicly consumable is powerful, though SDXL is not immune to abuse or NSFW (and possibly illegal) generations. I wonder who en
by padolsey 3y ago
This is so quick! The demo being publicly consumable is powerful, though SDXL is not immune to abuse or NSFW (and possibly illegal) generations. I wonder who ends up being held accountable for such generations.
- whelp_24 3y agoThat's a strange question. Why is nudity something that an image generator shouldn't be able to create? Are genitals a fiction that should never ve present in human art?
- sebzim4500 3y agoProbably the fear is about deepfakes rather than generic porn.
- padolsey 3y agoOh indeed. I believe these models should be uncensored. But as we’ve seen with the latest SD model, and with the much more locked down ‘LLM-fronted’ image generators from OpenAI and Google, safety is a massive concern and so they’ve been ridiculously cautious. Not only with the outputs but also with the training material. (‘Porn-In-Porn-Out’) Regardless of how we feel, lawyers and regulators wait at the door. We should expect new legal precedent within the next year re the generation of copyright-infringing, deepfake, and pornographic material.