5 ms·

Why do we not just remove the RFID radios and cameras from the cranes, or just not allow them to call home? This is a problem that doesn't require billions in

Why do we not just remove the RFID radios and cameras from the cranes, or just not allow them to call home? This is a problem that doesn't require billions in investment to solve, but rather a wire cutter.

rfoo 3y ago
> just remove the RFID radios and cameras from the cranes Because they require these to work. > or just not allow them to call home? I can't say for sure, but I believe they already don't call home: this is also why building a solution to block them from "what if they started to call home" doesn't work.
- lnxg33k1 3y ago
  > Because they require these to work. What if its wrapped in aluminium?:0
  - wakawaka28 3y ago
    Just guessing that the software forces you to put in tracking information for every item. If it can't read it, you'll have to input the stuff manually. I bet they make that interface painful too.
- mattlutze 3y ago
  If they don't call home, then the foreign interests wouldn't be getting the data, I think? If the concern is access to inferred logistics and crane telemetrics, then the solution would still seem to be removing access to the data or retrofitting new controls systems to the cranes, and not replacing the entire crane.
londons_explore 3y ago
Or just design a container whose RFID identity changes between being loaded onto the ship and being unloaded at the next port, making tracking impossible. Could be as simple as telling the captain of the ship to swap the RFID modules between two containers during the voyage.
- nonrandomstring 3y ago
  Like any system that is "monitored", it also presents the opportunity to feed disinformation to an adversary; what's labelled as submarine technology heading for one place is really anti-drone weaponry heading to a different front thousands of miles away.
  - wakawaka28 3y ago
    The volume and timing of containers is also important and leaks a lot of information. The weights probably have to be accurate too. Then, besides this, the whole thing is a bad idea. The Chinese will destroy these cranes in the event of a war with the US.
    - nonrandomstring 3y ago
      > destroy these cranes in the event of a war Indeed you are right. And I was once laughed out of security meeting for suggesting that allowing certain nations to build the control systems for one of our nuclear power plants might have issues. TBH, I think the laughter was very, very nervous and I distinctly heard the sound of a penny dropping. [0] https://www.punchline-gloucester.com/articles/aanews/edf-hinkley-nuclear-plant-chinese-role-in-spotlight https://www.punchline-gloucester.com/articles/aanews/edf-hin...
- mattashii 3y ago
  Even if you swap RFID identities during transit, the location of each container on the ship doesn't change much during any voyage, so this wouldn't materially change things: the tracker just has to update the ID references with the locations of the containers in the unloading port.
  - HeyLaughingBoy 3y ago
    If the location of the container changes while the ship is underway, you've got bigger issues than RFID tracking!
- 3y ago
NoPedantsThanks 3y ago
[dead]

rfoo 3y ago

> just remove the RFID radios and cameras from the cranes Because they require these to work. > or just not allow them to call home? I can't say for sure, but I believe they already don't call home: this is also why building a solution to block them from "what if they started to call home" doesn't work.

lnxg33k1 3y ago
> Because they require these to work. What if its wrapped in aluminium?:0
- wakawaka28 3y ago
  Just guessing that the software forces you to put in tracking information for every item. If it can't read it, you'll have to input the stuff manually. I bet they make that interface painful too.
mattlutze 3y ago
If they don't call home, then the foreign interests wouldn't be getting the data, I think? If the concern is access to inferred logistics and crane telemetrics, then the solution would still seem to be removing access to the data or retrofitting new controls systems to the cranes, and not replacing the entire crane.

londons_explore 3y ago

Or just design a container whose RFID identity changes between being loaded onto the ship and being unloaded at the next port, making tracking impossible. Could be as simple as telling the captain of the ship to swap the RFID modules between two containers during the voyage.

nonrandomstring 3y ago
Like any system that is "monitored", it also presents the opportunity to feed disinformation to an adversary; what's labelled as submarine technology heading for one place is really anti-drone weaponry heading to a different front thousands of miles away.
- wakawaka28 3y ago
  The volume and timing of containers is also important and leaks a lot of information. The weights probably have to be accurate too. Then, besides this, the whole thing is a bad idea. The Chinese will destroy these cranes in the event of a war with the US.
  - nonrandomstring 3y ago
    > destroy these cranes in the event of a war Indeed you are right. And I was once laughed out of security meeting for suggesting that allowing certain nations to build the control systems for one of our nuclear power plants might have issues. TBH, I think the laughter was very, very nervous and I distinctly heard the sound of a penny dropping. [0] https://www.punchline-gloucester.com/articles/aanews/edf-hinkley-nuclear-plant-chinese-role-in-spotlight https://www.punchline-gloucester.com/articles/aanews/edf-hin...
mattashii 3y ago
Even if you swap RFID identities during transit, the location of each container on the ship doesn't change much during any voyage, so this wouldn't materially change things: the tracker just has to update the ID references with the locations of the containers in the unloading port.
- HeyLaughingBoy 3y ago
  If the location of the container changes while the ship is underway, you've got bigger issues than RFID tracking!
3y ago

NoPedantsThanks 3y ago

[dead]