3 ms·

When film transitioned to video in the early 90s and many film school projects changed from $40K to $4K almost overnight, we didn't see a mess of new film maker

When film transitioned to video in the early 90s and many film school projects changed from $40K to $4K almost overnight, we didn't see a mess of new film makers because making good art is hard and almost always requires study and practice, even if the process is inexpensive (Picasso's brushes and black paint cost very little and were not difficult to acquire, it was his skill that was difficult to acquire.) We're not going to get better movies and shows by unleashing the TikTok generation on movies and shows. We'll get more, but not better because they are simply not capable of better. They don't have the training and the practice and it doesn't matter how cheap the tools if you don't have the ability, the skills that come with an education and a lot of trial and error. These skills are absent in all but the rarest of untrained persons so your friend's tv series is going to be shit, along with any tv series or movie created by people without the skills of a trained tv or movie maker. We don't need more shit. We have enough with the Disney, Apple, and Netflix and I should also include YouTube and TikTok. Wider is not better in art because art is a developed skill not a party trick. As someone who went to art and architecture schools, I promise you that the camcorder did not bring a grand new wave of democratized citizen cinema. It just didn't and neither will so-called A.I. because, once again, art is a skill, not trick. There are no shortcuts and no secrets to bypass learning and practice.

fragmede 3y ago
I didn't go to art school but that's hard to take. things like the blair witch project, Napoleon dynamite, the original mad max, and rocky were made on shoe string budgets and were the result of, yes, art skills, but also camcorders. not to mention that there is, actually, good stuff on YouTube. some of it the product of artists with art school degrees. there's gonna be a ton of ai generated shit out there, no doubt about that, but it also makes it more accessible. But okay, what I'm hearing is that it's going to be cheaper for Hollywood to pump out really good ones, putting people out of a job until they can retrain, from carpenters who were set builders to vfx artists, and Sora is just gonna let the low end pump out bad stuff and the high end will maybe use it to still pump out good stuff. in today's attention economy, I don't know what that means. there's a whole lot of SoundCloud out there and a lot of it's bad but some of it's good, and, like you said, it's a skill not a trick, so theres still going to be cream that rises to the top, even in a morass of ai generated dreck.

fragmede 3y ago

I didn't go to art school but that's hard to take. things like the blair witch project, Napoleon dynamite, the original mad max, and rocky were made on shoe string budgets and were the result of, yes, art skills, but also camcorders. not to mention that there is, actually, good stuff on YouTube. some of it the product of artists with art school degrees. there's gonna be a ton of ai generated shit out there, no doubt about that, but it also makes it more accessible. But okay, what I'm hearing is that it's going to be cheaper for Hollywood to pump out really good ones, putting people out of a job until they can retrain, from carpenters who were set builders to vfx artists, and Sora is just gonna let the low end pump out bad stuff and the high end will maybe use it to still pump out good stuff. in today's attention economy, I don't know what that means. there's a whole lot of SoundCloud out there and a lot of it's bad but some of it's good, and, like you said, it's a skill not a trick, so theres still going to be cream that rises to the top, even in a morass of ai generated dreck.