3 ms·
I don't care much for benchmarks, many models seems to be contaminated just to approach proprietary models in coding benchmarks. I had never tried Phind before
by tarruda 3y ago
I don't care much for benchmarks, many models seems to be contaminated just to approach proprietary models in coding benchmarks.
I had never tried Phind before, but gave Phind-70B a spin today and so far found it to be really good for coding writing and understanding, maybe even GPT-4 level. Hard to tell for sure since I only tested it on a single problem: Writing some web3 code in typescript. This is what I did:
- Gave it some specifications of a react hook that subscribes to a smart contract event and fetches historical events starting from a block number. It completed successfully.
- Took this code and gave it to GPT-4 to explain what it did, as well as finding potential issues. GPT gave a list of potential issues and how to address.
- Then I went back to the Phind and asked it to find potential issues in the code it had just written, and it found more or less the same issues GPT-4 had found.
- Went back to GPT-4 and asked to write a different version of the hook.
- Took the GPT-4 written code and asked it to explain the code, which it did successfully (though I think it lacked more details than the GPT-4 explanation of the code written by Phind).
I will be testing this more over the next days. If this proves to be in the GPT-4 ballpark and the 70b weights are released, I will definitely replace my ChatGPT plus subscription with Phind Pro.