3 ms·
My guess is they will go AI generated content. Will pull the content of the website to use and style guide for the AI and prevent anyone else from training AI o
by asimpleusecase 3y ago
My guess is they will go AI generated content. Will pull the content of the website to use and style guide for the AI and prevent anyone else from training AI on their past content. Also I wonder if the lawsuit from New York Times against OpenAI has any impact. I could see new Vice owners try the same thing if New York Times were successful. But also, OpenAI defence is that they did not train on NYT archive but content that was quoting NYT. If I remember correctly VICE had a lot of NYT content that was heavily quoted. Maybe pulling all the content saves them from getting into endless wrangles in the future.
- kristjansson 3y agoWhy would anyone want AI generated content from Vice, the brand known for direct, novel, firsthand reporting from relatively unknown/inaccessible places? Why would anyone want to read what an LLM thinks North Korea is like? For that matter why do we think anyone will want to read an LLM’s take on anything that has to be grounded in a reality that wasn’t part of its training data?
- Devasta 3y agoThey don't need the viewer to read the article, just need them to open the article and view ads.