2 ms·
How do you know teenagers were not using the content to create their own music? Funny how BigCorp gets benefit of the doubt. By the way, despite the name, Open
by endisneigh 3y ago
How do you know teenagers were not using the content to create their own music?
Funny how BigCorp gets benefit of the doubt. By the way, despite the name, OpenAI and teens are both doing it for their own gratification.
- edmundsauto 3y agoSome people were making really cool remixes! It’s not all or nothing, but if you can’t see the difference between making a tool for others to use, and copyright violations, I don’t see value in continuing the discussion.
- johnnyanmac 3y ago>if you can’t see the difference between making a tool for others to use, and copyright violations, I don’t see value in continuing the discussion. If a tool I used is suspected of containing copyright violations, it'd get sued. This happens even in software as Google v. Oracle has shown (among dozens of other cases. Maybe hundreds by now). And lo and behold, OpenAI is getting sued on suspicion of copyright violation. "tools for other to use" isn't a defense against copyright violation, and never has been.