3 ms·

> computational plagiarism Plagiarism is copying without attribution. Transformative works do not qualify as plagiarism.

• dylan604 3y ago
  when does it credit/attribute who/what/when/where the data it copied from?
  • brigadier132 3y ago
    You don't need to credit for a transformative work. LLMs don't regurgitate like you think they do.
    • pengaru 3y ago
      > LLMs don't regurgitate like you think they do. "Copilot has been found to regurgitate long sections of licensed code without providing credit — prompting this lawsuit that accuses the companies of violating copyright law on a massive scale." https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/8/23446821/microsoft-openai-github-copilot-class-action-lawsuit-ai-copyright-violation-training-data https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/8/23446821/microsoft-openai...
      • brigadier132 3y ago
        Like I said, they don't regurgitate the way you think they do. Doesn't mean it can't regurgitate data if it's overfit to the training data.
        • johnnyanmac 3y ago
          >they don't regurgitate the way you think they do. Copyright is about the outcome, not the destination. Short of edge cases where two contemporary inventors in different parts of the world funnel upon the same novel idea at the same-ish time, the method doesn't change how we interpret infringement. So the fact that it's capable of doing it is enough to bring about legal suspicion.