> Did he see the disaster as an opportunity to ply his trade at an even greater scale? So what? The artist had a style of art in which he was an expert and kno

> Did he see the disaster as an opportunity to ply his trade at an even greater scale? So what? The artist had a style of art in which he was an expert and known for. I totally get and respect that his art is not your cup of tea, but I don't see any negatives in the fact that he did see the opportunity to build this as a opportunity to "ply his trade" as you put it. Would you rather have him build something in a style he's totally unfamiliar with and bad at?