3 ms·
yes that are only good for simple cases, but at least for me those are not satisfying to solve so letting it write some boilerplate (copilot) or solve simple p
by Szpadel 3y ago
yes that are only good for simple cases, but at least for me those are not satisfying to solve
so letting it write some boilerplate (copilot) or solve simple problem that I don't want to waste my time for is providing me enough value to be worth spending money
also I find it very useful in filling out tests, where it mostly correctly fills other test cases given single example - again, not hard but time consuming
for harder problems I often find it useful when I debug something that I'm not familiar with, it usually give half of very generic advices but often suggest some valid starting points in investigation
(eg recently I had to debug openvpn server and I didn't touch them in years, issue was manifested with error about truncated packets and gpt was able to correctly suggest TLS negotiation)
sometimes I also use it rewrite/refactor code to see if maybe I would like different style/approach - this is rather rare, at begining I found it useful, now I think gpt started to often corrupt code or replace sections with comment with makes it much less useful