> I'm talking about something a little different. Hallucinations are still a problem. The AI doesn't actually know "what options are useful for scoring ...", i

> I'm talking about something a little different. Hallucinations are still a problem. The AI doesn't actually know "what options are useful for scoring ...", it's just regurgitating what someone else told it and when you ask it follow up questions it's unable to reason. AI's main feature is the first thing we disqualify people for in interviews. It's knowledge is pure buzzwords and hype. Example: I just asked chatGPT to tell me why framework X is better than framework Y. I am familiar with both frameworks. After the list chatGPT gives a disclaimer that starts with "However, it's essential to note that Y also has its own strengths". It then proceeds to list a few features that both frameworks share, a few features that are subjectively better and a few features that are actually bugs/code smell. That's not the AI's comparison of the two frameworks, that is just someones blog post that has been regurgitated to me in a way that gets around copyright.