4 ms·

I seem to have the opposite problem a lot of the time. I tried using Meta's image gen tool, and had such a time trying to get it to make art that was not "kind

by araes 3y ago

I seem to have the opposite problem a lot of the time. I tried using Meta's image gen tool, and had such a time trying to get it to make art that was not "kind of" sexual. It felt like Facebook's entire learning chain must have been built on people's sexy images of their girlfriend that's all now hidden in the art. These were examples that were not super blatant, like a tree landscape that just happens to have a human figure and cave in their crotch. Examples: https://i.imgur.com/RlH4NNy.jpg https://i.imgur.com/RlH4NNy.jpg - Art is very focused on the monster's crotch https://i.imgur.com/0M8RZYN.jpg https://i.imgur.com/0M8RZYN.jpg - The comparison should hopefully be obvious

Fischgericht 3y ago
Not meant in a rude way, but please consider that your brain is making these up and you might need to see a therapist. I can see absolutely nothing "kind of sexual" in those two pictures.
- araes 3y ago
  Not taken as rude. If its not an issue, then that's actually a positive for you. It means less time taken reloading trying to get it to not look like a human that happens to be made out of mountains.