> The immediate threat offers the opponent 5/6 losing moves, whereas yours offers only 2/6 losing moves. This would be relevant if humans made their choice wit

> The immediate threat offers the opponent 5/6 losing moves, whereas yours offers only 2/6 losing moves. This would be relevant if humans made their choice with a significant amount of randomness. But I argue that in this specific situation, very nearly every human will play to block the obvious threat. I believe humans will be more likely to pick one of the two losing moves in the slightly more abstract/delayed threat scenario, than they would be to pick one of the 5 losing moves in the immediate threat scenario.