3 ms·
No, it's that you cannot argue your point from any remotely rational basis. It's just whining because you think a political group might benefit if they do the r
by foofie 3y ago
No, it's that you cannot argue your point from any remotely rational basis. It's just whining because you think a political group might benefit if they do the right thing. It's purely cutting the nose to spite the face.
- sickofparadox 3y agoThere is no world in which using taxpayers' money to pay off debt that people VOLUNTARILY took on is "the right thing to do". When someone enters into a legal agreement, they complete their obligation - not beg the referee to let them cut and run. From where I'm standing there is no moral standing for your position but I at least attempt to understand it as you conceive of it, something you clearly can't do for mine.