4 ms·
>even direct confirmation from the model builders themselves Linking papers that you clearly haven't read and can't contextually apply -- as with the ViT or yo
by llm_nerd 3y ago
>even direct confirmation from the model builders themselves
Linking papers that you clearly haven't read and can't contextually apply -- as with the ViT or your misunderstanding of image tiling -- is not the sound strategy you hope it is. It doesn't confirm your claims.
I'm not asking anyone to "Trust me bro". So...have you called the Gemini Pro 1.5 API and tokenized an image or a video yet?
There is a certain element of this that is just spectacularly obvious to anyone who spent even a moment of critical thought -- if they're so capable -- on it. Your claim is that a high resolution image is tiled to a 16x16 array...and the magic model can at some later point magically on demand extract any and all details, such as OCR, from that 16x16. This betrays a fundamental ignorance of even the most basic of information theory.
Again, I would love to just block you and avoid the defensive insults you keep hurling, but this site lacks the ability. Stop replying to me, however many more contextually nonsensical citations you think will save face. Thanks.
- famouswaffles 3y ago>So...have you called the Gemini Pro 1.5 API and tokenized an image or a video yet? You continue to blow my mind. Have you...have you even used the gemini pro api before ? You can't use the api to get the image tokens. >This betrays a fundamental ignorance of even the most basic of information theory. Wow, something else you don't understand. Go figure.