> They certainly meant more intense representation of symptoms, of which there is a broad range. Perhaps, and hopefully so. > you need here but you’re wrong i

> They certainly meant more intense representation of symptoms, of which there is a broad range. Perhaps, and hopefully so. > you need here but you’re wrong in that there aren’t any tests for it. I've taken the CPT test, WAIS-IV, etc. and I am aware of the others to some degree. I never said there was no way to test for it. I said there was no definitive way to prove someone has ADHD beyond a reasonable doubt by means of any known biomarker. No blood test, fMRI, etc.. > I know this because I didn’t have any relief in symptoms until I took a few types of these and learned that my symptoms are far more of inattentative type than hyperactive and I had been completely mistreated for a long time. You have piqued my interest. What changed for you for I have seen no research about different subtypes being treated differently (I do not doubt its legitimacy though)? I am -C, but more likely on the -PH side of things. Stimulants have always been rather... less than effective to say the least.