3 ms·
Why would "shuf -n40000 filelist_h.txt" be slower than "cat filelist_h.txt | shuf -n40000"? Seems like there's a random-access optimization that's severely imp
by karmakaze 3y ago
Why would "shuf -n40000 filelist_h.txt" be slower than "cat filelist_h.txt | shuf -n40000"?
Seems like there's a random-access optimization that's severely impacting I/O performance.
- PennRobotics 3y agoI have no earthly idea, but WSL2 is known[1] for its snail-like cross-platform file transfers. Some of my colleagues install MSYS2 in parallel with WSL2 so they can sync our nightly much faster but still not have to jump through all the hoops of getting our proxy, certificates, network shares, etc working in MSYS2. I use the extra time waiting for WSL2 to get a coffee. [1] https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4197 https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4197