2 ms·
> aside from any externalities associated with it lol "i don't see any problems with waste aside from the problems with waste" have you ever see those drone s
by trial3 3y ago
> aside from any externalities associated with it
lol "i don't see any problems with waste aside from the problems with waste"
have you ever see those drone shots of children playing on 90ft mountains of fast fashion discards in chile and ghana or whatever? when you watch that, do you nod along sagely because the free market working perfectly and that's comforting for you
also, i disagree with the premise that we are "gatekeeping" car ownership unless we race to the bottom. you can buy used cars!
- gruez 3y ago>lol "i don't see any problems with waste aside from the problems with waste" And if you read the sentence right after, you'd see my alternate proposal rather than trying to set an arbitrary durability threshold. >If that's what you're concerned about, those should be taxed at the source, rather than letting that slide but trying to regulate it by enforcing minimum durability standards.
- AndrewKemendo 3y agoThat’s a good description of the insane dystopia we’re all culpable in. Born into this nightmare with no ways out