3 ms·
Human beings seem to be hard-wired to equate the appearance of coherent language with evidence of cognition. Even on Hacker News, where people should know bette
by krapp 3y ago
Human beings seem to be hard-wired to equate the appearance of coherent language with evidence of cognition. Even on Hacker News, where people should know better, a lot people seem to believe LLMs are literally sentient and self aware, not simply equivalent to but surpassing human capabilities in every dimension.
I mean, I know a lot of that is simply the financial incentives of people whose job it is to push the Overton window of LLMs being recognized as legal beings equivalent to humans so that their training data is no longer subject to claims of copyright infringement (because it's simply "learning as a human mind would") but it also seems there's a deep seated human biological imperative being hacked here. The sociology behind the way people react to LLMs is fascinating.
- dambi0 3y agoCan you elaborate on what you mean by appearance in the first sentence? Also cognition. Is this the same as understanding or is thinking a better synonym? Can you think of any examples from before say 2010 where there would be any reason for a human to wonder whether another party engaged in a coherent conversation has any reason to assume they were not engaged with another hunan?