4 ms·
I don't get it. The default case is simple (go run .), and the complex case (specifying the relevant .go files one by one) is a little bit more complex. What's
by mseepgood 3y ago
I don't get it. The default case is simple (go run .), and the complex case (specifying the relevant .go files one by one) is a little bit more complex. What's frustrating with that?
- skissane 3y ago> I don't get it. The default case is simple (go run .), and the complex case (specifying the relevant .go files one by one) is a little bit more complex. What's frustrating with that? The problem is many Go tutorials start out by teaching the complex case first and leave the simple case to later (if they cover it at all).
- rtheunissen 3y agoMaybe it is because the simple way requires knowledge of packages, which are covered later perhaps, since many tutorials go straight to "go run helloworld.go"
- skissane 3y agoYou don't need to cover packages. You could just say this: the standard convention is that the source for each Go program lives in its own directory, and it starts running the code in a file called `main.go`. To run the Go program in the current directory, run `go run .` Introducing the concept of "packages", and the fact that the directory is a package, can be deferred until later.
- aeturnum 3y agoIt's not this specifically - it's when this "kind of thing" comes up in golang in particular. Every language needs to pick when to hold back complexity and when to make the user deal with it and I just personally dislike golang's particular balance. I also respect the work! It just irritates me.