3 ms·
Someone fact checked me yesterday regarding the findings from Yale. As if random media personalities outweigh an actual published preprint. This summarizes thi
by thenerdhead 3y ago
Someone fact checked me yesterday regarding the findings from Yale. As if random media personalities outweigh an actual published preprint.
This summarizes this conundrum quite well:
> “Both things can be true,” Krumholz said in an interview. “They can save millions of lives, and there can be a small number of people who’ve been adversely affected.”
What we are learning about with regards to the immune system is that our bodies hate persistent antigens.
https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.adi9379 https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.adi9379
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45107-3 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45107-3
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-023-01724-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-023-01724-6
Additionally, there is a wonderful talk that covers many of these things here:
https://duke.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Play/ce2ecf77e1934b30aa50e33e74b63e2d1d https://duke.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Play/ce2ecf77e1934b30aa...
- xcrunner529 3y agoI liken it to people who are afraid to fly because “it’s dangerous”. Have issues with flights happened? Yes. Is it still drastically safer than the alternatives (driving)? Yes. That part get missed.