https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes/issues/11 https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes/issues/11 > While I strongly support defining the applica

https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes/issues/11 https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes/issues/11 > While I strongly support defining the application/yaml media type, I do not think that the text/yaml should be defined at this time. [...] Defining more than one media type is superfluous, and creates unnecessary uncertainty. The bare-text presentation of YAML content to a human is already now achievable by presenting YAML as text/plain