3 ms·

I had the same question. Turns out, it's mostly a future possibility, and for most current use cases of branches in git, you would use a channel in pijul. At le

I had the same question. Turns out, it's mostly a future possibility, and for most current use cases of branches in git, you would use a channel in pijul. At least that's how I understand these discussions in the pijul discourse. https://discourse.pijul.org/t/phenomenological-pijul-or-pijul-from-the-outside/906/3 https://discourse.pijul.org/t/phenomenological-pijul-or-piju... https://discourse.pijul.org/t/working-without-channels/1047/1 https://discourse.pijul.org/t/working-without-channels/1047/...

IlliOnato 3y ago
Thank for the links! I've looked at them, and while they gave me more and interesting information on Pijul, they did not explain how you can work without multiple channels in a realistic development environment. However, from these pages it appears that working with channels in Pijul is more cumbersome than working with branches in Git.