3 ms·
Boy I just can't stop thinking about that weekend when Sam got booted from OpenAI, and Anthropic turned down the offer to acquire OpenAI. If I were CEO of Anthr
by vessenes 3y ago
Boy I just can't stop thinking about that weekend when Sam got booted from OpenAI, and Anthropic turned down the offer to acquire OpenAI. If I were CEO of Anthropic, I would have had one job that weekend.
I am very curious about Anthropic's strategy right now; they launched with "More progressive and careful about AI risks," which in my opinion is a good AI worker recruiting strategy, but not a good commercial strategy, or even a good quality strategy, based on Claude's current state.
They have done some outstanding research this year -- in particular, I loved their work on tracking conceptual bundles through different layers, and I'd say their paper on embedding adversarial behavior in LLMs was my favorite paper of the year -- But, I'd like to see that research turn into more capable models.
As I write this, I wonder what I'd do if I were in charge there. I think I'd probably try and one-up Mistral, and release larger more capable models more quickly. I'd try and buy Groq and build a custom vertically integrated stack that's 5x faster in tokens/s; worst case Amazon could help with the acquisition and deploy Grok into AWS. Basically the moat would be deployed tokens/s at or above certain levels of quality. I'd stop running anything but my own models on Groq hardware.
There are two next-gen directions for inference in the cloud, high quality multi-modal foundation models, which are definitely coming, but also clearly need some UI work to get into a compelling product format, and very long context length models, so I guess I'd possibly be trying to leapfrog there. It's highly competitive in the model space right now, so a model-only strategy isn't good.
Alternatively, I could sit back and relax and let AWS pimp Claude while we just scaled it up to 250k tokens and used MoE to get non-exponential scaling / possibly explore an SSM / Mamba architecture, and not worry too much since we have 4bn in the bank. I wouldn't be surprised if that latter path is the one they're on, sadly.
- swyx 3y agoturned down what offer? was it a serious offer? i doubt anthropic had the funds to actually acquire it.
- hackerlight 3y agoThe board approached the Anthropic CEO (Dario Amodei) and proposed a merger with him as CEO. Possibly because he presents as safety conscious. He declined.
- woah 3y agoWow that seems incredibly stupid. But I guess maybe he knew that he would get kneecapped by some backroom corporate jiujitsu by Sam who would then take over the new merged company, leaving Dario with nothing except for an incredibly fat severance payout and all his stock.
- samspenc 3y agoMore about that board move here https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-approached-anthropic-about-merger https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-approached-an... And non-paywalled https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/11/report-openai-tried-and-failed-to-hire-anthropic-ceo-to-replace-sam-altman/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/11/report-openai-tr...
- chucke1992 3y ago> they launched with "More progressive and careful about AI risks," which in my opinion is a good AI worker recruiting strategy, It really depends. I think a lot of developers don't care about being "progressive or careful" and more about being more cutting edge.