4 ms·
much like Tesla's Autopilot which cannot be responsible for an accident because you're supposed to be hands-on-wheel and alert at all times while using it.
by deegles 3y ago
much like Tesla's Autopilot which cannot be responsible for an accident because you're supposed to be hands-on-wheel and alert at all times while using it.
- w0m 3y agoThat issue is media mostly optics I think. Once you sit down with it, it's simply a better cruise control. Now, if you are talking about 'Full Self Driving' - then yea, there's a waiver and a point there.
- efitz 3y agoIt's not optics. It's regulatory intervention: https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2023/RCAK-23V838-3395.pdf https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2023/RCAK-23V838-3395.pdf I think the recall is dumb. If you are not paying attention and have an accident, then you are at fault. You already have to click-through agree to use the feature properly, and Tesla has an interior camera to capture a photo of the person agreeing and telemetry to send it to the mothership. For that matter, Tesla could make you read the waiver on camera and capture that before enabling autopilot or FSD.