I agree that there probably will be “uncensored” fine tuned models that become available, my point was just that it’s not accurate to call Gemma “the opposite o

I agree that there probably will be “uncensored” fine tuned models that become available, my point was just that it’s not accurate to call Gemma “the opposite of censored” because there is a somewhat involved step that needs to be taken before it even appears uncensored. It’s also likely missing a lot of useful context that was removed from the training set and not meaningfully replaced during fine-tuning, and besides that any fine tuned “uncensored” model will be based on Gemma, not Google’s Gemma itself. IMO “Opposite of uncensored” suggests a model whose original form eagerly gives out controversial / typically censored information, not a model that is censored but able to be fine tuned away from censorship.