>No, not for 100% of the voters. What about 5%? >But you can still say that the issue is "well agreed upon". You can say whatever you like, but whether what

>No, not for 100% of the voters. What about 5%? >But you can still say that the issue is "well agreed upon". You can say whatever you like, but whether what one says is true is an important but often ~uncomfortable detail. > If there was a "huge opposition to conscription because it is slavery", then one or more of the political parties in Sweden would be opposed to it. Reality necessarily resolves this way, without exception? And, this is knowable, and known, necessarily? Incorrect belief is not possible here? > There is also no political debate about conscription in Sweden on ethical grounds. Are you describing your knowledge of mainstream debate, or the fact of the matter of all debate in existence, however "serious" it appears (aka: is)? > Compare this with the monarchy and the king in Sweden. The thing itself, or some memetic cultural narrative of it, like what one reads in the newspaper or on internet forums? If the former: how? If the latter: why? To what end?