2 ms·
Or possibly more hostile. We're talking about something which doesn't exist. It'd be reasonable for people to be skeptical, and assume at least an equal likelih
by karaterobot 3y ago
Or possibly more hostile. We're talking about something which doesn't exist. It'd be reasonable for people to be skeptical, and assume at least an equal likelihood of the new Facebook also not respecting their privacy, given the precedent. But I don't think the median social network user cares much about privacy at all, so that's probably not why there is no new Facebook, one way or the other.