> and don't cite any evidence other than "this might affect spouses of military members who move a lot" It's in the article itself. Also, confidential sources

> and don't cite any evidence other than "this might affect spouses of military members who move a lot" It's in the article itself. Also, confidential sources are supposed to be, well, confidential. > Our first source cited personal experience of the return-to-office order's impact and told us only two men were affected, compared to 29 women. Our source made calculations about the impact using internal data, and suggested women will bear the brunt of the RTO mandate. > "Per sample data pulled, this group is disproportionately female," with women whose partners serve in the military perhaps especially impacted as life in uniform often means relocation. This suggests that the source has access to HR records. They could also be making all this up, of course, but I wouldn't trust Dell as an entity that respects workers' rights.