You'all are responding like a 100 token LLM. The context is, "is an activist method" necessary, or could the existing objective viewpoint take into account a f

You'all are responding like a 100 token LLM. The context is, "is an activist method" necessary, or could the existing objective viewpoint take into account a fuller understanding of history over time. So yes. Of course we gain a better understanding of history. Does that require activist methods? Throwing out old methods? Is the change fundamental to methodology? No. This is a real paper published by the University of Oregon under these new activist "methods". I present "Feminist Glacier Studies". It adds nothing of value and if anything, reduces the net value of the field. This is what a non-objectivity lens does to the field of knowledge. It destroys it. History is the same way. And no, Joan de Arc was not trans. https://courses.ecology.uga.edu/ecol8000-materials/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2022/08/Carey-et-al.-2016.pdf https://courses.ecology.uga.edu/ecol8000-materials/wp-conten...