There are probably arguments either way, some things are quite obviously better remote, and some things in person. Managing people is maybe easier in person. I

There are probably arguments either way, some things are quite obviously better remote, and some things in person. Managing people is maybe easier in person. It's certainly easier if you're a 'controlling boss', as you can intimidate and harry employees much more effectively in the flesh (I'm not advocating that btw). It makes you wonder. Why are companies often so against hiring (as employees) people who have been freelance, or run their own business, for example? Perhaps a good part of the whole institution of the 'company' is about coercion, rather than just 'working together for a common purpose'.