3 ms·
The synde remarks at metas llama license that doesn't allow companies with 700 million monthly active users to use it, while this model also doesn't have a real
by artninja1988 3y ago
The synde remarks at metas llama license that doesn't allow companies with 700 million monthly active users to use it, while this model also doesn't have a really 'open' license itself and also this paragraph:
>As the ecosystem evolves, we urge the wider AI community to move beyond simplistic ’open vs. closed’ debates, and avoid either exaggerating or minimising potential harms, as we believe a nuanced, collaborative approach to risks and benefits is essential. At Google DeepMind we’re committed to developing high-quality evaluations and invite the community to join us in this effort for a deeper understanding of AI systems.
- tomComb 3y agoWell, given that that restriction added to the meta-llama license is aimed at Google, is petty, and goes against open source norms, I think it’s reasonable that they should feel this way about it.
- lordswork 3y agoHow is this a snide remark? It's factual and prevented their team from benchmarking against Llama 2.
- trisfromgoogle 3y agoQuick question -- can you tell me where you got that quote? It's not in the main blog or any of the launch communications that I can see.
- artninja1988 3y agoThe quote is from the technical report https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemma/gemma-report.pdf https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemma/gemma-re...
- trisfromgoogle 3y agoAh, thanks for clarifying! It's a good flag, though I wouldn't classify it as a snide comment personally. I'd be interested in hearing what you find snide or offensive about it -- do you think we shouldn't be trying to bring the whole community along for evals/safety/etc, regardless of open/closed?