> you should expect something to go wrong the first time you test it. This was the second test-firing since 2016; that one failed too. I think that means they

> you should expect something to go wrong the first time you test it. This was the second test-firing since 2016; that one failed too. I think that means they haven't done a successful test-firing in eight years. That doesn't inspire confidence (or awe, depending on who it's supposed to impress).